View from Silicon Valley
Addendum to Myth #5
Home
Santa Clara Co. median (updated Nov15)
San Mateo Co. median
Santa Cruz Co. median
Santa Clara Co. stats (updated Nov9th)
SEMI B:B to Jul'08 (updated Oct24)
SIA Data '04 -Jul'08 (updated Nov1st)
Wafer area vs.SIA$ 2Q08(updated Aug30)
VC Funding -3Q08! (updated Nov1st!)
SV Stats
Links
About Us
April 11, 2007

Addendum to Myth #5:

(c) View From Silicon Valley, 2007.  All rights reserved.


 
In addition to distributing yesterday's "Myth #5: "Priced Right" directly to our subscribers, the following was sent to Mike Shedlock, owner and editor of the widely-read http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/
 
"Hello Mike Shedlock:
 
As former Florida residents, Mike Morgan's reports usually catch our eye.  Your removal of his piece published over the weekend really caught our eye.
 
This is just a heads up on a piece which went up this evening (Monday).  It's part of an on-going "Myths" series, this time referencing Mike Morgan's published, then de-published, report repeatedly using the term "priced right." 
 
I assume we are much smaller & less widely-read than you or Mike Morgan but if anyone has a rebuttal, we'd be interested to read it.
 
Regards,
View From Silicon Valley"
* * * * * * * *
 
Today we received replies from both Mike Shedlock and from Mike Morgan.
 
Mike Shedlock wrote,
"Mike Morgan is one of the good guys and is most assuredly giving his real estate clients and newsletter clients the same information.

Morgan tried to talk them out of buying but they wanted to buy, believing the NAR that prices have bottomed. Following is a sentence that was in what Morgan sent me but was inadvertently edited out from what I posted on my blog.

This deal was so tight with cash down and financing, that I finally gave up my commission to make the deal work.  It was a 2% commission so I kicked in $5,000 to put them in this house.

He did this to make the deal work for his client and down the road figures that a happy client will get him enough free word of mouth advertising to make it up. Perhaps it will and perhaps it won't but
how many real estate agents would give up their full commission to a client?

Thus the idea that he took this deal simply to make a commission is obviously untrue (given  new information that you did not have) as is the idea that he is giving two sets of information to two different sets of clients. 

I would appreciate it if you would post this reply as an addendum to to your article.

Thanks
Mish
* * * * *
A few hours later we also heard from Mike Morgan:
"Comments from Mike Morgan in red.
 
I do not make most of my income as a real estate agent.  I am a consultant to hedge fund managers, analysts and high net worth individuals.  I also own an Internet Marketing company that represents a healthy chunk of his income.

I am consistent with information, and have been so for two years now.  I have been recommending that all of my clients rent, and look to buy as prices continue to drop.  I would be better off saying nothing and taking the commission now, as not all of the people that decide to rent will return to me to buy.  If you had the pleasure of reading my updates and published pieces, you'd see that I remain consistent and dedicated to both my retail and institutional clients.

Mike Morgan"
* * * * * * *
It is not the mission of this web site to needlessly criticize or disparage people out there trying to do the right thing.
 
We apologize to Mr. Morgan for incorrectly inferring what happened.  If it is any defense, the information which explained the financial details was never published (and we are accepting Mr. Morgan's & Mr. Shedlock's say-so for what "should" have been published). 
 
As an aside, we do not readily recall Mike Shedlock's web site revealing Mr. Morgan even had, "updates and published pieces" not available to the general public.  (Maybe we should have assumed it after Mr. Morgan mentioned he had Wall Street clients?)
 
Regardless, we were wrong about Mr. Morgan.  We hope this will set the record straight.
 
Keep in mind the primary point of our last missive was "priced right" is an abused, even mythical, concept.  Despite attempts to "change the assumptions," in over-priced, over-inventoried and over-flipped RE markets this description remains unchallenged...

* * * *
The above and any linked article, website or advertisement are not intended as advice to buy, sell or hold any stock, bond, real estate nor any other financial product or service. Buy and sell at your own risk (just like we do.)